Graves v. Burns, Lane & Richardson

166 A. 166, 110 N.J.L. 607
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 15, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 A. 166 (Graves v. Burns, Lane & Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graves v. Burns, Lane & Richardson, 166 A. 166, 110 N.J.L. 607 (N.J. 1933).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The evidence examined abundantly supports the findings of the Supreme Court. The judgment is therefore affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court reported supra.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Neylon v. Ford Motor Company
86 A.2d 577 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A. 166, 110 N.J.L. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-burns-lane-richardson-nj-1933.