Graves v. Burns, Lane & Richardson
166 A. 166, 110 N.J.L. 607
Opinion
The evidence examined abundantly supports the findings of the Supreme Court. The judgment is therefore affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court reported supra.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Heher, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Graves v. Burns, Lane & Richardson, 166 A. 166, 110 N.J.L. 607 (N.J. 1933).
166 A. 166 (Graves v. Burns, Lane & Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Neylon v. Ford Motor Company
86 A.2d 577 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)