Graves v. Bowers

Mississippi Supreme Court

Graves v. Bowers

2 Miss. Dec. 374

Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided April 9, 1883·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion.

Per curiam:

' The bill is not aptly drawn, but we think it sufficiently alleges the parol partition. The prayer for relief seems to rest the case [379] mainly uipon. the alleged mistake in the deed of November, 1871, but it does not do tbis to the exclusion of the right growing out of the parol partition. The partition is clearly shown by the testimoney.

Decree reversed and decree here for defendant on tbe cross-bill.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion.

Per curiam:

' The bill is not aptly drawn, but we think it sufficiently alleges the parol partition. The prayer for relief seems to rest the case [379] mainly uipon. the alleged mistake in the deed of November, 1871, but it does not do tbis to the exclusion of the right growing out of the parol partition. The partition is clearly shown by the testimoney.

Decree reversed and decree here for defendant on tbe cross-bill.

Graves v. Bowers, 2 Miss. Dec. 374 (Mich. 1883).

Pincite

2 Miss. Dec. 374 (Graves v. Bowers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related