Graves v. Boone

38 Va. Cir. 365, 1996 Va. Cir. LEXIS 81
CourtRichmond County Circuit Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1996
DocketCase No. LA-2663-4
StatusPublished

This text of 38 Va. Cir. 365 (Graves v. Boone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Richmond County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graves v. Boone, 38 Va. Cir. 365, 1996 Va. Cir. LEXIS 81 (Va. Super. Ct. 1996).

Opinion

By Judge Randall G. Johnson

I have now read all of [the] submissions related to defendant’s demurrer, special pleas, and motion. Only the plea of the statute of limitations needs to be considered, and a hearing would not be helpful to me.

Basically, plaintiff alleges that defendant, a practicing attorney, committed malpractice during his representation of plaintiff on criminal charges. By plaintiff’s own statements in the motion for judgment and subsequent pleadings, that representation ended in 1985 when plaintiff’s habeas corpus petition was denied by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Contrary to plaintiff’s assertion, there is no provision of Virginia law which tolls the statute of limitations on an inmate’s cause of action while the inmate is incarcerated. In fact, the statute of limitations is not tolled. See Almond v. Kent, 459 F.2d 200, 203 (4th Cir. 1972). Since the statute of limitations in this action is, at most, the five-year statute for a written contract, plaintiff’s action, filed in 1995, is far too late. It will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 Va. Cir. 365, 1996 Va. Cir. LEXIS 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graves-v-boone-vaccrichmondcty-1996.