Graves v. Barganier

134 So. 874, 223 Ala. 167, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 138
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided May 28, 1931·No. 3 Div. 946.·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

ANDERSON, C. J.

This appeal is from an order or decree of the circuit court, in equity, striking from the file the bill of complaint. In the case of Hayes v. Hayes, 192 Ala. 280, 68 So. 351, this court held that it was without jurisdiction to entertain an appeal from orders of the lower court in chancery unless such a decree or order is either a final decree or is one of the certain interlocutory orders provided by statute. The decree in question is not one of the interlocutory ones provided by statute, nor is it such a final decree as will support an appeal. Whatever may be the rule in other jurisdictions, our court has long been committed to the rule that an order of the trial court in striking a complaint without more will not support an appeal, but can be reviewed by mandamus. Davis v. McColloch, 191 Ala. 520, 67 So. 701, and cases cited.

Appeal dismissed.

GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Graves v. Barganier, 134 So. 874, 223 Ala. 167, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 138 (Ala. 1931).

134 So. 874 (Graves v. Barganier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Birmingham v. Hallmark
98 So. 2d 15 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Byrd v. Sorrells
93 So. 2d 146 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1957)
Ex parte Maddox
89 So. 2d 916 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Dorrough v. McKee
89 So. 2d 77 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1956)
Austin v. Eyster
6 So. 2d 892 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1942)
Keith & Wilkinson v. Forsythe
151 So. 60 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)