Graven v. Scott
This text of 249 A.D. 514 (Graven v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The proceeding was brought to obtain a peremptory order of mandamus directing the respondents, as trustees of the police pension fund of the city of New Rochelle, to pay to the petitioner the sum of $375, being the amount of his contributions, [515]*515two per cent of his monthly salary, during the period of his service as a police officer of that city. The petitioner resigned from the police force.
The statute, chapter 268 of the Laws of 1904, “ An Act to provide for a pension fund for the police force of the city of New Rochelle,” contains no provision authorizing or directing a refund to a police officer, upon his resignation, of contributions made by him during his incumbency in office; and the court is without power to read such a provision into the statute. (Pennie v. Reis, 132 U. S. 464, 471; Clarke v. Reis, 87 Cal. 543; 25 P. 759; McKuskie v. Hendrickson, 128 N. Y. 555, 558; McCluskey v. Cromwell 11 id. 593, 601; Leach v. Auwell, 154 App. Div. 170, 176.)
The order should be affirmed, with costs.
Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Order denying an application for a peremptory mandamus order unanimously affirmed, with costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 A.D. 514, 292 N.Y.S. 771, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9634, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graven-v-scott-nyappdiv-1937.