Gravely v. West Virginia

Fourth Circuit

Gravely v. West Virginia

333 F. App'x 758

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2009·No. No. 09-6770·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gravely v. West Virginia, No. 2:09-cv-00112 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [759] and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gravely v. West Virginia, No. 2:09-cv-00112 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [759] and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gravely v. West Virginia, 333 F. App'x 758 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

333 F. App'x 758 (Gravely v. West Virginia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.