Gravely v. West Virginia

333 F. App'x 758
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2009
DocketNo. 09-6770
StatusPublished

This text of 333 F. App'x 758 (Gravely v. West Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gravely v. West Virginia, 333 F. App'x 758 (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Gravely appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his petition for a writ of coram nobis. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gravely v. West Virginia, No. 2:09-cv-00112 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court [759]*759and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
333 F. App'x 758, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gravely-v-west-virginia-ca4-2009.