Gravelle v. Kaba Ilco Corp.

561 F. App'x 267
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 21, 2014·No. No. 13-2167·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gordon Gravelle appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate the final arbitration award and granting Defendants’ motion to confirm the same. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Gravelle leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gravelle v. Kaba Ilco Corp., 5:13-cv-00160-FL, 2013 WL 5230355 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2013). [268] We also deny Gravelle’s motion for leave to supplement. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gravelle v. Kaba Ilco Corp., 561 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2014).

561 F. App'x 267 (Gravelle v. Kaba Ilco Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.