Gravano v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

97 N.E.3d 396, 73 N.Y.S.3d 787, 31 N.Y.3d 988
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided March 29, 2018·No. No. 23·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs. A computer-generated image may constitute a "portrait" within the meaning of Civil Rights Law §§ 50 and 51 *397**788(see Lohan v. Take-Two Interactive Software , 31 N.Y.3d 111, 121-122, 73 N.Y.S.3d 780, 97 N.E.3d 389 [2018] [ decided herewith] ). Plaintiff, however, is not recognizable from the images at issue here, namely, the "Andrea Bottino" avatar in the video game in question (see Cohen v. Herbal Concepts , 63 N.Y.2d 379, 384, 482 N.Y.S.2d 457, 472 N.E.2d 307 [1984] ).

In view of our determination, we do not address plaintiff's additional contentions.

Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Feinman concur. Judge Wilson took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gravano v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc., 97 N.E.3d 396, 73 N.Y.S.3d 787, 31 N.Y.3d 988 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2018).

97 N.E.3d 396 (Gravano v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Herbal Concepts, Inc.
472 N.E.2d 307 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Lohan v. Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
97 N.E.3d 389 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 2018)