Gravady Nev., Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Mejia)

Nevada Supreme Court

Gravady Nev., Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Mejia)

DecidedJune 17, 2022

Docket84534

StatusPublished

This text of Gravady Nev., Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Mejia) (Gravady Nev., Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Mejia)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gravady Nev., Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Mejia), (Neb. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GRAVADY NEVADA, LLC, A NEVADA No. 84534 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND CIRCUSTRIX, LLC, A UTAH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioners, VS. FILED THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JUN 1 7 2022 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERitF RENE COURT CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE BY DEPUTY CLERK NADIA KRALL, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and JESUS MEJIA, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion for summary judgment in a tort action. Having considered the petition and its supporting documents, we are not persuaded that writ relief is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted). Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and whether to consider a petition seeking such relief is within this court's sole discretion. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). We generally decline to exercise that discretion as to petitions challenging orders denying summary judgment motions, and we are not convinced that any of the exceptions for doing so apply in this case.

eV.- 19 2og See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (discussing the exceptions to the general rule). We therefore ORDER the petition DENIED.'

.J. P rraguirre

cc: Hon. Nadia Krall, District Judge Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, LLP/Las Vegas Bighorn Law/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 404,4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GRAVADY NEVADA, LLC, A NEVADA No. 84534 LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; AND CIRCUSTRIX, LLC, A UTAH LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Petitioners, VS. FILED THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, JUN 1 7 2022 IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERitF RENE COURT CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE BY DEPUTY CLERK NADIA KRALL, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and JESUS MEJIA, AN INDIVIDUAL, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion for summary judgment in a tort action. Having considered the petition and its supporting documents, we are not persuaded that writ relief is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted). Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and whether to consider a petition seeking such relief is within this court's sole discretion. Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). We generally decline to exercise that discretion as to petitions challenging orders denying summary judgment motions, and we are not convinced that any of the exceptions for doing so apply in this case.

eV.- 19 2og See Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 113 Nev. 1343, 1344-45, 950 P.2d 280, 281 (1997) (discussing the exceptions to the general rule). We therefore ORDER the petition DENIED.'

.J. P rraguirre

cc: Hon. Nadia Krall, District Judge Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, LLP/Las Vegas Bighorn Law/Las Vegas Eighth District Court Clerk

1The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A 404,4

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gravady Nev., Llc v. Dist. Ct. (Mejia), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gravady-nev-llc-v-dist-ct-mejia-nev-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack