Grauley v. Jermyn

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Grauley v. Jermyn

30 A. 203, 163 Pa. 501, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1210

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 1, 1894

DocketAppeal, No. 150

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A. 203 (Grauley v. Jermyn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grauley v. Jermyn, 30 A. 203, 163 Pa. 501, 1894 Pa. LEXIS 1210 (Pa. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McCollum,

We are unable to discover anything in the first, second and third specifications of error which calls for a reversal of this judgment. Strictly speaking the register itself was the best evidence of what was written or printed upon it.

The fourth, fifth and sixth specifications raise substantially the same question that was raised and passed upon in Perrine v. Jermyn, just decided [the preceding case.] In that case as in this the principal matter complained of was the instruction in relation to notice of the revocation or termination of the agency. Our ruling in that case applies to and governs this.

The specifications of error are overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI