Grau v. State
This text of 188 So. 3d 5 (Grau v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm Charles Grau’s conviction and sentence for aggravated battery with great bodily harm, but remand for correction of two scriveners’ errors in the second amended probation .order. First, the order incorrectly reflects that Grau entered a guilty plea to the aggravated battery charge, rather than noting that Grau was found guilty following a jury trial. Second, the order conflicts with the trial court’s sentencing order and oral pronouncement regarding the imposition of the public defender appointed counsel application fee.
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scriveners’ errors.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 So. 3d 5, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 2449, 2016 WL 672076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grau-v-state-fladistctapp-2016.