Grau v. Longworth

21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 174
CourtOhio Circuit Courts
DecidedJanuary 23, 1909
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 174 (Grau v. Longworth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grau v. Longworth, 21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 174 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1909).

Opinion

SWING, J.

The evidence in this case does not tend to show that the building leased by Grau from Longworth was destroyed or so injured by the elements or other cause so as to be unfit for occupancy; and the court was right in instructing a verdict for the plaintiff. The evidence tends-to show that the repairs made on the building made the premises less desirable for the business that plaintiff in error was engaged in, but this is not sufficient ground under the statute to authorize the tenant to quit the premises. The premises must be made unfit for occupancy and there was no evidence which tends to show this.

Judgment affirmed.

Giffen and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ohio C.C. Dec. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grau-v-longworth-ohiocirct-1909.