Gratz v. M. M. Graves Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gratz v. M. M. Graves Co.

204 A.D. 881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1922

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 A.D. 881 (Gratz v. M. M. Graves Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gratz v. M. M. Graves Co., 204 A.D. 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Although the rule in the First and Second Departments differs as to the character of proof required to show that the defendant is a foreign corporation on an application for a writ of attachment, yet, in the interest of uniformity between the two Departments, we have concluded to adopt the rule of the First Department expressed in Stiner v. Tennessee Copper Co., No. 1 (176 App. Div. 209). Black-mar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Although the rule in the First and Second Departments differs as to the character of proof required to show that the defendant is a foreign corporation on an application for a writ of attachment, yet, in the interest of uniformity between the two Departments, we have concluded to adopt the rule of the First Department expressed in Stiner v. Tennessee Copper Co., No. 1 (176 App. Div. 209). Black-mar, P. J., Rich, Kelly, Manning and Young, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

204 A.D. 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gratz-v-m-m-graves-co-nyappdiv-1922.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack