Gratz v. Cavanagh

18 A.D.2d 887, 237 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4449
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 5, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 18 A.D.2d 887 (Gratz v. Cavanagh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gratz v. Cavanagh, 18 A.D.2d 887, 237 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4449 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

Order, entered on December 27, 1960, dismissing petition in an article 78 proceeding, unanimously affirmed. The time limitations in section B19-7.83 of the Administrative Code are directory and do not constitute a Statute of Limitations rendering action of the Pension Board outside these limitations nugatory. Petitioner failed to allege facts from which a reasonable conclusion could be drawn that the Medical Board acted arbitrarily or capriciously. Concur -—Botein, P. J., Rabin, Eager, Steuer and Noonan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ornstein v. Regan
574 F.2d 115 (Second Circuit, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 A.D.2d 887, 237 N.Y.S.2d 654, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gratz-v-cavanagh-nyappdiv-1963.