Grattage v. Grattage
This text of 2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 12 (Grattage v. Grattage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
RESCRIPT
The respondent seeks to void the decree allowing the eompalinant temporary alimony by producing an agreement for separation between the parties, in which for the consideration of $75 the complainant agreed to waive her rights to support.
Such agreements are valid if fair and reasonable. We are of the opinion, however, that the sum of $75 was a merely nominal consideration and by no means adequate.
The motion to modify the decree is therefore denied.
Commonwealth of Penn. vs. Smith, 13 Penn. Superior Court, 358.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Super. Ct. (R.I.) 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grattage-v-grattage-risuperct-1918.