Grathwol v. Coastal Carolina Developers, Inc.

628 F. App'x 193
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 11, 2016
DocketNos. 15-1233, 15-1236, 15-1237
StatusPublished

This text of 628 F. App'x 193 (Grathwol v. Coastal Carolina Developers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grathwol v. Coastal Carolina Developers, Inc., 628 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

The Appellants in these consolidated appeals seek to appeal the district court’s orders. affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders dismissing each of the three underlying adversary proceedings for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Because we find that the proceedings were not “related to” the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case in which they were filed, see Valley Historic Ltd, P’ship v. Bank of N.Y., 486 F.3d 831, 835 (4th Cir.2007), we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grathwol v. Coastal Carolina Developers, Inc.; Ann F. Grathwol Living Trust v. Coastal Carolina Developers, Inc.; Legacy Group of NC, Inc. v. Coastal Carolina Developers, Inc., Nos. 7:14-cv-00082-F; 7:14-cv-00083-F; 7:14-cv-00084-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
628 F. App'x 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grathwol-v-coastal-carolina-developers-inc-ca4-2016.