Grate v. Waccamaw EOC

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Joseph N. Grate, Appellant,

v.

Waccamaw EOC, Inc., Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2012-209227

Appeal From Horry County

William H. Seals, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-247 Submitted May 1, 2013 – Filed June 12, 2013

AFFIRMED

Joseph N. Grate, of Pawleys Island, pro se.

Ralph J. Wilson, Sr., of Ralph J. Wilson, Attorney at Law, P.A., of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Ulmer v. Ulmer, 369 S.C. 486, 490, 632 S.E.2d 858, 861 (2006) ("An appellate court will not consider issues on appeal which have not been preserved for appellate review."); Peay v. Ross, 292 S.C. 535, 537, 357 S.E.2d 482, 484 (Ct. App. 1987) ("Since the insufficiency of the evidence was not properly raised at trial, [this court] cannot review the judgment on that ground."); Lites v. Taylor, 284 S.C. 316, 318, 326 S.E.2d 173, 175 (Ct. App. 1985) ("The failure of a [party] to move for a directed verdict at trial precludes a challenge on appeal to the sufficiency of the evidence.").

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.