Grasty v. Anderson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1964

RAEBURN S. GRASTY,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ISAAC T. ANDERSON, Officer; CHRISTOPHER M. HAMILTON,

Defendants – Appellants,

and

THE CITY OF ROANOKE; A.L. JOE GASKINS, Chief of Police; BARBARA P. CARTER,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (7:09-cv-00471-SGW-PMS)

Submitted: January 25, 2011 Decided: February 10, 2011

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Ross Spencer, CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellants. Raeburn S. Grasty, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Isaac T. Anderson and Christopher M. Hamilton appeal

the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part

summary judgment for the Appellants. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Grasty v. Anderson,

No. 7:09-cv-00471-SGW-PMS (W.D. Va. Aug. 13, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED