Grasso v. Ottenbrite

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 1, 2005
Docket05-1214
StatusUnpublished

This text of Grasso v. Ottenbrite (Grasso v. Ottenbrite) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grasso v. Ottenbrite, (4th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-1214

BARBARA J. GRASSO,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

SHELLY OTTENBRITE,

Defendant - Appellant,

and

MICHAEL GUNLICKS,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-666)

Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 1, 2005

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Debra Desmore Corcoran, JACKSON LAW GROUP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Barbara J. Grasso, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Shelly Ottenbrite seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders granting partial summary judgment in favor of Barbara J.

Grasso in Grasso’s breach of contract action and denying

Ottenbrite’s motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and

certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292

(2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan

Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order Ottenbrite seeks to appeal

is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or

collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Grasso v. Ottenbrite, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grasso-v-ottenbrite-ca4-2005.