Grasso v. Grasso

143 So. 3d 1050, 2014 WL 3613192, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11162
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 23, 2014
Docket2D13-5186
StatusPublished

This text of 143 So. 3d 1050 (Grasso v. Grasso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grasso v. Grasso, 143 So. 3d 1050, 2014 WL 3613192, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11162 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

Margaret and Michelle Grasso, individually and as purported cotrustees of the Olga Grasso Revocable Living Trust (Trust), challenge various orders entered by the trial court regarding the Trust. We reverse the cost/fee order entered on October 18, 2013, to the extent that it taxed costs against Margaret and Michelle individually in the amount of $7907.10 and remand with instructions to vacate that portion of the order. We affirm the trial court in all other respects without comment.

Olga Grasso asserted no claims against Margaret or Michelle in their individual capacities but only as purported cotrus-tees. As such, Margaret and Michelle were not parties to the action in their individual capacities and the trial court erred in taxing costs against them individually. See Beseau v. Bhalani, 904 So.2d 641, 642 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (“Although Appellant, ‘individually’ was named in the complaint’s caption, the body of the complaint makes clear that her claims were made solely as personal representative of the estate. Thus, Appellant was never a party to the action in her individual capacity.”).

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded.

ALTENBERND and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beseau v. Bhalani
904 So. 2d 641 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
143 So. 3d 1050, 2014 WL 3613192, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 11162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grasso-v-grasso-fladistctapp-2014.