Grassmann v. Fromm

New York Court of Appeals

Grassmann v. Fromm

56 N.E.2d 114, 292 N.Y. 699, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1853

DecidedMay 25, 1944

StatusPublished

This text of 56 N.E.2d 114 (Grassmann v. Fromm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grassmann v. Fromm, 56 N.E.2d 114, 292 N.Y. 699, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1853 (N.Y. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Inhere was evidence from which the jury could have found that the plaintiff was a licensee to whom the defendant owed the duty to refrain from an act of affirmative negligence. In those circumstances the questions of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence were for the jury. No opinion.

Concur: LehmaN, Ch. J., LottgheaN, Lewis, CoNwat, Desmond and Thachee, JJ. Taking no part: Bippey, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. Inhere was evidence from which the jury could have found that the plaintiff was a licensee to whom the defendant owed the duty to refrain from an act of affirmative negligence. In those circumstances the questions of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence were for the jury. No opinion.

Concur: LehmaN, Ch. J., LottgheaN, Lewis, CoNwat, Desmond and Thachee, JJ. Taking no part: Bippey, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 N.E.2d 114, 292 N.Y. 699, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grassmann-v-fromm-ny-1944.