Graso v. State

155 S.W. 209, 69 Tex. Crim. 633, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 183
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 19, 1913
DocketNo. 2365.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 155 S.W. 209 (Graso v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graso v. State, 155 S.W. 209, 69 Tex. Crim. 633, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 183 (Tex. 1913).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of unlawfully carrying on and about his person knuckles made of some character of metal.

The complaint and information were filed on the 25th day of November, 1912, charging that on 23rd of November appellant carried the said knuckles about his person. The information was filed the same day of the complaint. The evidence for the State, through the witness Miller, is that on the 27th day of November, 1912, he was deputy constable of precinct No. 1, in Dallas County, and on the night of said day he and two officers were standing on the corner of Jackson and Houston Streets in the City of Dallas, where he arrested the defendant. While standing on said corner, he saw the defendant in company with other Mexicans coming down the sidewalk; that when they approached the corner where he was standing he stopped the defendant and arrested him. Then follows what occurred between them at the time he arrested defendant, and at the time he arrested him he searched and found on him the knuckles charged in the information.

Without discussing any other feature of this case this conviction can not be sustained. On the 25th of November appellant was charged with having knucfes on his person on the 23rd day of November, two days prior to the complaint and information. The facts show the witness Miller took the knucks from him on the 27th of November, two days after the complaint and information were filed. The evidence must show that the offense had been committed before the making of the complaint and information. The complaint can not charge an offense to be committed in the future.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chewning v. State
237 S.W. 946 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 S.W. 209, 69 Tex. Crim. 633, 1913 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graso-v-state-texcrimapp-1913.