Graphic Scanning Corp. v. People Pager, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Graphic Scanning Corp. v. People Pager, Inc.

81 A.D.2d 800, 440 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11457

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 26, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 81 A.D.2d 800 (Graphic Scanning Corp. v. People Pager, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Graphic Scanning Corp. v. People Pager, Inc., 81 A.D.2d 800, 440 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11457 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 19, 1980, modified, on the law, to the extent of denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the fourth and fifth causes of action of the complaint, said causes reinstated and the order otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Special Term dismissed the entire complaint with leave to replead the causes we reinstate. Those causes are sufficiently pleaded to be permitted to stand; indeed, they were not that conclusorily stated that defendants had difficulty either in asserting answers to them, or in framing interrogatories addressed to them. We agree with Special Term’s reasons for having dismissed the first three causes: that no fiduciary duties were owed by the parties claimed to have breached them. Concur — Ross, Carro and Markewich, JJ. Kupferman, J. P., dissents and would affirm on the opinion of Evans, J., at Special Term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 19, 1980, modified, on the law, to the extent of denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the fourth and fifth causes of action of the complaint, said causes reinstated and the order otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Special Term dismissed the entire complaint with leave to replead the causes we reinstate. Those causes are sufficiently pleaded to be permitted to stand; indeed, they were not that conclusorily stated that defendants had difficulty either in asserting answers to them, or in framing interrogatories addressed to them. We agree with Special Term’s reasons for having dismissed the first three causes: that no fiduciary duties were owed by the parties claimed to have breached them. Concur — Ross, Carro and Markewich, JJ. Kupferman, J. P., dissents and would affirm on the opinion of Evans, J., at Special Term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

81 A.D.2d 800, 440 N.Y.S.2d 584, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graphic-scanning-corp-v-people-pager-inc-nyappdiv-1981.