Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. v. Pine Bush Cent. Sch. Dist.

2018 NY Slip Op 1566
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 9, 2018
Docket2016-03454
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 1566 (Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. v. Pine Bush Cent. Sch. Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. v. Pine Bush Cent. Sch. Dist., 2018 NY Slip Op 1566 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. v Pine Bush Cent. Sch. Dist. (2018 NY Slip Op 01566)
Graphic Arts Mut. Ins. Co. v Pine Bush Cent. Sch. Dist.
2018 NY Slip Op 01566
Decided on March 9, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on March 9, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
L. PRISCILLA HALL, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
SANDRA L. SGROI
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2016-03454
(Index No. 6304/15)

[*1]Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company, respondent-appellant,

v

Pine Bush Central School District, et al., appellants-respondents.


Hogan Lovells US, LLP, New York, NY (Ira M. Feinberg of counsel), for appellants-respondents.

Lester Schwab Katz & Dwyer, LLP (Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, LLP, New York, NY [Jonathan K. Youngwood, Janet A. Gochman, and Robert Arnay], of counsel), for respondent-appellant.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal and cross appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Elaine Slobod, J.), dated February 3, 2016. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted that branch of the defendants' motion for summary judgment which was to dismiss the fifth cause of action only to the extent of directing entry of a judgment declaring that the amount of the settlement in an underlying action entitled T.E. v Pine Bush Central School Dist., commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under case number 12-CV-2203, was reasonable up to the sum of $1,846,000, and otherwise referred for trial the question of the reasonableness of the amount of the settlement that exceeds the sum of $1,846,000 in that action. The order, insofar as cross-appealed from, granted that branch of the defendants' motion for summary judgment which was to dismiss the fifth cause of action to the extent of directing the entry of a judgment declaring that the amount of the settlement in the underlying action was reasonable up to the sum of $1,846,000.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the facts, without costs or disbursements, and that branch of the defendants' motion for summary judgment which was to dismiss the fifth cause of action is denied as premature.

In light of our determination on the companion appeal (see Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance Company v Pine Bush Central School District, _____ AD3d _____ [Appellate Division Docket No. 2015-11565; decided herewith]), it is premature to render a determination on the reasonableness of the settlement amount tendered by the defendants in the underlying action entitled T.E. v Pine Bush Central School Dist., commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York under case number 12-CV-2203, until the issue of indemnification has been decided.

HALL, J.P., AUSTIN, SGROI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 1566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/graphic-arts-mut-ins-co-v-pine-bush-cent-sch-dist-nyappdiv-2018.