Grantz v. Grantz

23 So. 2d 383, 156 Fla. 392, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 865

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided September 25, 1945·Published

Opinion

*393 PER CURIAM:

For final decree granting divorce and dismissing defendant’s counter claim, defendant in the court below has perfected appeal.

The decree was rendered after consideration of voluminous conflicting testimony and evidence by way of exhibits.

There is ample substantial evidence as disclosed by the transcript to support the decree and, therefore, the same is affirmed.

So ordered.

TERRELL, BUFORD, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*393 PER CURIAM:

For final decree granting divorce and dismissing defendant’s counter claim, defendant in the court below has perfected appeal.

The decree was rendered after consideration of voluminous conflicting testimony and evidence by way of exhibits.

There is ample substantial evidence as disclosed by the transcript to support the decree and, therefore, the same is affirmed.

So ordered.

TERRELL, BUFORD, THOMAS and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Grantz v. Grantz, 23 So. 2d 383, 156 Fla. 392, 1945 Fla. LEXIS 865 (Fla. 1945).

Pincite

23 So. 2d 383 (Grantz v. Grantz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.