Grantwood Lumber Co. v. Hughes

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Grantwood Lumber Co. v. Hughes

131 A. 925, 4 N.J. Misc. 94, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 343

DecidedJanuary 28, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 131 A. 925 (Grantwood Lumber Co. v. Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grantwood Lumber Co. v. Hughes, 131 A. 925, 4 N.J. Misc. 94, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 343 (N.J. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

This suit was brought in the Second Judicial District Court of Hudson county to recover compensation for damages done to an automobile parked at a standstill at the curb, on the easterly side of Park avenue, in the town of Weehawken, on January 25th, 1925. The automobile of the plaintiff was struck by the motor truck of the defendant operating in a northerly direction along Park avenue, causing the damages sued for.

The case was tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff files four specifications of the determination of the court with which the appellant is dissatisfied. We cannot say that the trial judge was wrong in rendering judgment for the defendant under the state of the ease settled by fhe court and sent up with the record.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Curiam.

This suit was brought in the Second Judicial District Court of Hudson county to recover compensation for damages done to an automobile parked at a standstill at the curb, on the easterly side of Park avenue, in the town of Weehawken, on January 25th, 1925. The automobile of the plaintiff was struck by the motor truck of the defendant operating in a northerly direction along Park avenue, causing the damages sued for.

The case was tried by the court without a jury, resulting in a judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff files four specifications of the determination of the court with which the appellant is dissatisfied. We cannot say that the trial judge was wrong in rendering judgment for the defendant under the state of the ease settled by fhe court and sent up with the record.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

131 A. 925, 4 N.J. Misc. 94, 1926 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grantwood-lumber-co-v-hughes-nj-1926.