Granthum v. Granthum

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Granthum v. Granthum

374 So. 2d 1104, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15748

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 6, 1979

DocketNo. MM-124

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 374 So. 2d 1104 (Granthum v. Granthum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Granthum v. Granthum, 374 So. 2d 1104, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15748 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs, record and/or argument in this cause we affirm in part and reverse in part. The appellant did not demonstrate error with regard to the trial court’s denial of his claim for a special equity in the marital home. We affirm that portion of the trial court’s order.

However, the trial court did err in not providing for the husband to receive credit for the wife’s share of the mortgage payment, taxes and insurance on the marital home which he is required to pay. Strollo v. Strollo, 365 So.2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (1st DCA 1979). That portion of the trial court’s judgment is reversed and remanded [1105]*1105for entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs, record and/or argument in this cause we affirm in part and reverse in part. The appellant did not demonstrate error with regard to the trial court’s denial of his claim for a special equity in the marital home. We affirm that portion of the trial court’s order.

However, the trial court did err in not providing for the husband to receive credit for the wife’s share of the mortgage payment, taxes and insurance on the marital home which he is required to pay. Strollo v. Strollo, 365 So.2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (1st DCA 1979). That portion of the trial court’s judgment is reversed and remanded [1105]*1105for entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

374 So. 2d 1104, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15748, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/granthum-v-granthum-fladistctapp-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack