Granthum v. Granthum

374 So. 2d 1104, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15748
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 6, 1979·No. No. MM-124·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs, record and/or argument in this cause we affirm in part and reverse in part. The appellant did not demonstrate error with regard to the trial court’s denial of his claim for a special equity in the marital home. We affirm that portion of the trial court’s order.

However, the trial court did err in not providing for the husband to receive credit for the wife’s share of the mortgage payment, taxes and insurance on the marital home which he is required to pay. Strollo v. Strollo, 365 So.2d 189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978), Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So.2d 539 (1st DCA 1979). That portion of the trial court’s judgment is reversed and remanded [1105]*1105for entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Granthum v. Granthum, 374 So. 2d 1104, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15748 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

374 So. 2d 1104 (Granthum v. Granthum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Purger v. Purger
3 Fla. Supp. 2d 1 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1981)