Grantham v. State
This text of 695 So. 2d 892 (Grantham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anthony Scott GRANTHAM, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Elizabeth A. Broome, Pensacola, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the trial court's summary denial of Grantham's motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. He filed a prior rule 3.850 motion, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. It was summarily denied. In this motion, Grantham alleges ineffective assistance of counsel once more, and a new groundinvoluntary plea. Since the grounds set forth in this motion were raised or should have been raised in the *893 prior motion, the current motion is both successive and improper, and constitutes an abuse of procedure. See Freeman v. State, 683 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).
AFFIRMED.
W. SHARP, THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
695 So. 2d 892, 1997 WL 336939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grantham-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.