Grantham v. Clark

62 N.H. 426
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedDecember 5, 1882
StatusPublished

This text of 62 N.H. 426 (Grantham v. Clark) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grantham v. Clark, 62 N.H. 426 (N.H. 1882).

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The question raised by the demurrer to the first replication is settled in Marshall v. Sumner, 59 N. H. 218. The demurrer is sustained.

A collector of taxes is a public officer. Tucker v. Aiken, 7 N. H. 113; Gordon v. Clifford, 28 N. H. 402; G. L., cc. 40, 41, 42. A debt due from the collector to the town for taxes collected by him and not paid over as required by law, is a debt created by his defalcation as a public officer, and while acting in a fiduciary capacity, and is not barred by his disharge in bankruptcy. U. S. liev. St., s. 5117; Morse v. Lowell, 7 Met. 152; Cronan v. Cotting, 104 Mass. 245; Neal v. Clark, 95 U. S. 704; Chapman v. Forsyth, 2 How. 202. The demurrer to the second replication is overruled.

Blodgett, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chapman v. Forsyth & Limerick
43 U.S. 202 (Supreme Court, 1844)
Neal v. Clark
95 U.S. 704 (Supreme Court, 1878)
Cronan v. Cotting
104 Mass. 245 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
62 N.H. 426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grantham-v-clark-nh-1882.