Grantham, David Keith

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 24, 2021
DocketWR-89,904-01
StatusPublished

This text of Grantham, David Keith (Grantham, David Keith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grantham, David Keith, (Tex. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-89,904-01

EX PARTE DAVID KEITH GRANTHAM, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. C36803-CR IN THE 13TH DISTRICT COURT FROM NAVARRO COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Applicant pleaded guilty to engaging in organized crime and was sentenced to 27 years years’

imprisonment. The Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Grantham v. State, No. 10-17-

00365-CR (Nov. 7, 2018). Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county

of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art.

11.07.

Applicant contends that he lost the opportunity to accept a plea offer due to counsel’s

deficient performance and as a result he received a more severe sentence. Lafler v. Cooper, 566 U.S.

156, 163, 168 (2012); see also Missouri v. Frye, 566 U.S. 134, 147 (2012); Ex parte Battle, 817

S.W.2d 81, 84 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). 2

The habeas court has concluded that Applicant would not have rejected the 15-year plea offer

if counsel had given him adequate advice. The court also concludes that it is reasonably probable

that, if Applicant had been properly informed, he would have accepted the plea offer, the State would

not have withdrawn the offer, and the court would have accepted the plea bargain. Ex parte Argent,

393 S.W.3d 781, 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); see also Cooper, 566 U.S. at 163-64.

Relief is granted. Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (1985); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781

(Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The judgment in cause number C36803-CR in the 13th District Court of

Navarro County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Navarro

County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary

bench warrant within ten days from the date of this Court’s mandate.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and the Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Delivered: February 24, 2021 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hill v. Lockhart
474 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Lafler v. Cooper
132 S. Ct. 1376 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Missouri v. Frye
132 S. Ct. 1399 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Ex Parte Battle
817 S.W.2d 81 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Ex parte Argent
393 S.W.3d 781 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Grantham, David Keith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grantham-david-keith-texcrimapp-2021.