Grant v. Zipern
This text of 233 A.D. 695 (Grant v. Zipern) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment as against defendants Zipern and Robins reversed upon the law, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. The record herein does not establish such a condition of the metal door step as would afford a basis for a finding of negligence on the part of the said defendants, who maintained it, especially in a case where the evidence does not disclose that the plaintiff slipped upon a portion of the step said to have been worn smooth. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
233 A.D. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-zipern-nyappdiv-1931.