Grant v. White

California Supreme Court

Grant v. White

57 Cal. 141

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1880

DocketNo. 6,843

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 57 Cal. 141 (Grant v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. White, 57 Cal. 141 (Cal. 1880).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court :

We are of opinion that no ground appears for setting aside the default of the defendant Sarah L. White. It does not appear but that Mr. Venable was authorized to represent her. We do not see that fraud or imposition was practiced upon her at the time of the execution of the mortgage, and we are of opinion that there was nothing improper in the professional conduct of Mr. Venable. We think the rule regarding the execution of instruments by married women is correctly stated by Mr. J ones in his work on Mortgages, § 538.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court :

We are of opinion that no ground appears for setting aside the default of the defendant Sarah L. White. It does not appear but that Mr. Venable was authorized to represent her. We do not see that fraud or imposition was practiced upon her at the time of the execution of the mortgage, and we are of opinion that there was nothing improper in the professional conduct of Mr. Venable. We think the rule regarding the execution of instruments by married women is correctly stated by Mr. J ones in his work on Mortgages, § 538.

Judgment and order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Cal. 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-white-cal-1880.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack