Grant v. White

6 Cal. 55
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1856
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 6 Cal. 55 (Grant v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grant v. White, 6 Cal. 55 (Cal. 1856).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.

Mr. Chief Justice Murray concurred.

The only point raised by the Bill of Exceptions is the want of proper notice by defendant’s counsel of the time for argument of the motion for a new trial. The notice, it seems, was served on Mr. Kewen after [56]*56his connection with the case had ceased, and the defence of it had heen turned over to Mr. Crockett. To avail the defendant of this objection, there should have been a regular substitution of counsel in the mode pointed out by the statute.

There is no statement of the case which will enable us to consider the other assignments of error. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Bouchard
49 Cal. 2d 438 (California Supreme Court, 1957)
Sherman v. Panno
277 P.2d 80 (California Court of Appeal, 1954)
Reynolds v. Reynolds
134 P.2d 251 (California Supreme Court, 1943)
Candal v. Vargas
29 P.R. 251 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1921)
Choctaw, O. G. R. Co. v. Burgess
1908 OK 81 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1908)
Wilkinson v. Tilden
14 F. 778 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1883)
Roush v. Fort
3 Mont. 175 (Montana Supreme Court, 1878)
Abrahms v. Stokes
39 Cal. 150 (California Supreme Court, 1870)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Cal. 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-white-cal-1856.