Grant v. Whitchurch

600 So. 2d 512, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6609, 1992 WL 123478
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 10, 1992·No. No. 91-2463·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse a summary judgment for the defendants. The trial court erred by striking paragraph 5(c) of the amended complaint. Therefore, there remain issues of [513] fact whether the defendants, in the conduct of their babysitting service, are liable for the negligent supervision of, or a failure to supervise, the plaintiffs’ child.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur. LETTS, J., dissents without opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. Whitchurch, 600 So. 2d 512, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 6609, 1992 WL 123478 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

600 So. 2d 512 (Grant v. Whitchurch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Grant v. Whitchurch
614 So. 2d 17 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)