Grant v. Syracuse Door & Blind Co.

New York Supreme Court

Grant v. Syracuse Door & Blind Co.

23 N.Y.S. 1151, 67 Hun 650, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 650, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940

DecidedFebruary 23, 1893

StatusPublished

This text of 23 N.Y.S. 1151 (Grant v. Syracuse Door & Blind Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. Syracuse Door & Blind Co., 23 N.Y.S. 1151, 67 Hun 650, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 650, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

No opinion. Judgment modified, by striking therefrom the provision directing Kellog to pay $385.64 damages, and authorizing execution therefor, and, in lieu thereof, inserting a provision directing the appointment of a receiver for the corporation, and providing that, after his appointment and qualification, defendant Kellog shall pay over to him $2,409.80, being the amount received by Kellog on his judgment and execution, to be distributed by the receiver among the creditors of the corporation according to their respective rights and Interests; the provision in the injunction allowing plaintiffs costs as awarded to remain, and the judgment, as so modified, affirmed, with costs of this appeal to the defendant Kellog.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

No opinion. Judgment modified, by striking therefrom the provision directing Kellog to pay $385.64 damages, and authorizing execution therefor, and, in lieu thereof, inserting a provision directing the appointment of a receiver for the corporation, and providing that, after his appointment and qualification, defendant Kellog shall pay over to him $2,409.80, being the amount received by Kellog on his judgment and execution, to be distributed by the receiver among the creditors of the corporation according to their respective rights and Interests; the provision in the injunction allowing plaintiffs costs as awarded to remain, and the judgment, as so modified, affirmed, with costs of this appeal to the defendant Kellog.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 N.Y.S. 1151, 67 Hun 650, 74 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 650, 51 N.Y. St. Rep. 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-syracuse-door-blind-co-nysupct-1893.