Grant v. Steenland Construction Co.

135 A. 917, 100 N.J. Eq. 566, 15 Stock. 566, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 650

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1927·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the conrt below by Vice-Chancellor Baches.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Min-turn, KLalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 11. .

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. Steenland Construction Co., 135 A. 917, 100 N.J. Eq. 566, 15 Stock. 566, 1927 N.J. LEXIS 650 (N.J. 1927).

Pincite

135 A. 917 (Grant v. Steenland Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.