Grant v. State

1915 OK CR 96, 146 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 701, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 95
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 11 Okla. Crim. 396
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided March 16, 1915·No. No. A-2150.·Published

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted of unlawfully selling whisky to Henry Boushay, and on the 25th day of September, 1913, judgment was rendered, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a period of one hundred and five days, and to pay a fine of three hundred dollars, and costs, taxed at $65.55. Prom the judgment an appeal was taken. The questions presented have heretofore been passed upon and deter *702 mined adversely to the contentions of the learned counsl for plaintiff in error. It 'is sufficient to say that the guilt of plaintiff in error was satisfactorily proven and no testimony was offered in his behalf. It follows that the judgment herein should be, and the same is hereby affirmed, and the cause remanded to the county court of Pottawatomie county with direction to enforce its judgment and sentence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. State, 1915 OK CR 96, 146 P. 1197, 11 Okla. Crim. 701, 1915 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 95 (Okla. Ct. App. 1915).

1915 OK CR 96 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.