Grant v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Grant v. State

548 S.W.3d 925

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 12, 2018

DocketNo. ED 105811

StatusPublished

This text of 548 S.W.3d 925 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. State, 548 S.W.3d 925 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Grant appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *926setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Grant appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *926setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

548 S.W.3d 925, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-state-moctapp-2018.