Grant v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Grant v. State

548 S.W.3d 925

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 12, 2018·No. No. ED 105811·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Grant appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *926setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jeremy Grant appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous and affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, *926setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Grant v. State, 548 S.W.3d 925 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

548 S.W.3d 925 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.