Grant v. State
This text of 293 S.W.3d 461 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Lewis C. Grant appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 1 motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Brooks v. State, 242 S.W.3d 705, 708 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons *462 for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2006, unless otherwise indicated.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 S.W.3d 461, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1263, 2008 WL 4210922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-state-moctapp-2008.