Grant v. State

325 S.E.2d 179, 172 Ga. App. 897, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 3096
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 160 Ga. App. 837
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 5, 1984·No. 69362·Published

Opinion

Benham, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of 11 counts of forgery in the first degree and sentenced to 10 years to serve 7 on each count. His attorney filed a motion to withdraw as counsel pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (87 SC 1396, 18 LE2d 493) (1967). In accordance with Anders, counsel has filed a brief raising points of law which he considered could arguably support an appeal. We are in agreement with counsel that none of the points raised, though persuasively presented, has any merit. We have therefore granted the motion to withdraw. In addition, we have fully examined the record and transcript to determine independently if there are any meritorious errors of law. We have found none. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize any rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528) (1980).

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, P. J., and Pope, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Grant v. State, 325 S.E.2d 179, 172 Ga. App. 897, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 3096 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).

325 S.E.2d 179 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Jackson v. Virginia
443 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1979)
Baldwin v. State
264 S.E.2d 528 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)