Grant v. State
305 S.E.2d 186, 166 Ga. App. 248, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2119
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Grant v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 160 Ga. App. 837 →
Opinion
Shulman, Chief Judge.
Appellant and his co-defendant, Johnny Wright, were found guilty of armed robbery. In his sole enumeration of error, appellant contends that the in-court identification testimony of the victims should not have been admitted since it was tainted by a prior confrontation with the witnesses at a preliminary hearing. This issue has been decided adversely to appellant by this court’s decision in the appeal of appellant’s co-defendant. Wright v. State, 164 Ga. App. 587 (298 SE2d 294).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grant v. State, 305 S.E.2d 186, 166 Ga. App. 248, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2119 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).
305 S.E.2d 186 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wright v. State
298 S.E.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)