Grant v. State

156 S.E. 642, 42 Ga. App. 438, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 813
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 13, 1931
Docket21055
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 S.E. 642 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Grant v. State, 156 S.E. 642, 42 Ga. App. 438, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 813 (Ga. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

1. Under the allegations of the indictment and the evidence adduced upon the trial it was not error for the court to instruct the jury on the law of assault and battery.

2. In the absence of an appropriate written request, the court did not err in failing to charge the jury “that the defendant had made no statement in the case, but that in arriving at the truth in the case, they should not take that fact into consideration, and that they should not weigh the fact that he did not make a statement either for or against him, and that it should not have any prejudicial effect against him for not denying the crime that he was charged with.”

3. While the evidence amply authorized a verdict of assault with intent to murder, it also authorized a verdict for the lesser offense of assault and battery, and the refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and, Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brooks v. State
11 S.E.2d 688 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 S.E. 642, 42 Ga. App. 438, 1931 Ga. App. LEXIS 813, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-state-gactapp-1931.