Grant v. State
This text of 449 S.E.2d 611 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Rogerick Grant was found guilty of felony murder and aggravated assault.1 On appeal, he argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel and that the trial court erred in giving or failing to give certain charges to the jury.
We have reviewed all of the claims of error. We hold that the evidence is sufficient under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979); that there was no constitutional deprivation; and that there was no error in the trial court that warrants reversal or a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
449 S.E.2d 611, 264 Ga. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-state-ga-1994.