Grant v. State
45 Ga. 477
Opinion
In this case the Court feels constrained, by section 3183 of the Code, to reverse the judgment of the Court below, and therefore renders the following judgment: Where, in acrim[478] inal case, the Court charges the jury, “ it is my opinion that you can infer from Grant’s [the defendant’s] admission, that the pistol which he shot had a ball in it, inasmuch as he undertook to point out the place where the ball struck, whether that was the place or not,” this Court is required by Revised Code, section 3183, to grant a new trial.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grant v. State, 45 Ga. 477 (Ga. 1872).
45 Ga. 477 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Baker v. State
33 S.E.2d 277 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1945)
McRae v. Boykin
187 S.E. 271 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)
Clark v. State
10 S.E. 1094 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1890)
Kinnebrew v. State
5 S.E. 56 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1887)