Grant v. State
650 So. 2d 705, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 1995 WL 79905
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 1, 1995·No. No. 94-2114·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
As the State properly concedes, the trial court erred in imposing a ten year mandatory minimum provision on the defendant’s thirty year sentence, when he was sentenced as a habitual felony offender, not a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993). Therefore, the ten year mandatory provision is reversed. The remaining arguments raised by the defendant lack merit.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Grant v. State, 650 So. 2d 705, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 1995 WL 79905 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
650 So. 2d 705 (Grant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aburto v. State
848 So. 2d 1197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)