Grant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grant v. State

650 So. 2d 705, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 1995 WL 79905

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2114

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 650 So. 2d 705 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. State, 650 So. 2d 705, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 1995 WL 79905 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, the trial court erred in imposing a ten year mandatory minimum provision on the defendant’s thirty year sentence, when he was sentenced as a habitual felony offender, not a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993). Therefore, the ten year mandatory provision is reversed. The remaining arguments raised by the defendant lack merit.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As the State properly concedes, the trial court erred in imposing a ten year mandatory minimum provision on the defendant’s thirty year sentence, when he was sentenced as a habitual felony offender, not a habitual violent felony offender. See § 775.084(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1993). Therefore, the ten year mandatory provision is reversed. The remaining arguments raised by the defendant lack merit.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

650 So. 2d 705, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 1971, 1995 WL 79905, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack