Grant v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Grant v. State

573 So. 2d 1055, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 885, 1991 WL 13578

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 6, 1991

DocketNo. 90-00140

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 573 So. 2d 1055 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. State, 573 So. 2d 1055, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 885, 1991 WL 13578 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

FRANK, Judge.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions in all respects. The trial court, however, apparently departed from the guidelines recommended range without stating written or oral reasons. The scoresheet recommendation was five and a half to seven years in prison for the offenses of armed robbery with a deadly weapon and aggravated battery, yet the court sentenced the defendant to nine years.

Accordingly, we remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FRANK, Judge.

We affirm the appellant’s convictions in all respects. The trial court, however, apparently departed from the guidelines recommended range without stating written or oral reasons. The scoresheet recommendation was five and a half to seven years in prison for the offenses of armed robbery with a deadly weapon and aggravated battery, yet the court sentenced the defendant to nine years.

Accordingly, we remand for resentencing within the guidelines.

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

573 So. 2d 1055, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 885, 1991 WL 13578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack