Grant v. State
This text of 363 So. 2d 1063 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Charles Grant was tried by a jury and convicted of battering another person in violation of Section 784.03(l)(a), Florida Statutes (1975).1 His challenge to the constitutionality of the statute, as violating due process of law on the grounds of over-breadth and vagueness, brings his conviction and sentence here for review.2
We find no merit in Grant’s arguments concerning the validity of the battery statute, and we find no infirmity in his trial. The evidence was more than adequate to support the jury’s verdict. Grant’s conviction and sentence are affirmed.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
363 So. 2d 1063, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4830, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-state-fla-1978.