Grant v. State
This text of 291 So. 2d 381 (Grant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Second degree murder: sentence, twenty years in the penitentiary.
Rule A, 49 Ala.App. XXI has not been complied with.
The State’s case rests on circumstantial evidence, including the appellant’s flight-part way in the deceased’s car. See Cobern v. State, 273 Ala. 547, 142 So.2d 869.
[291]*291Circumstantial evidence may afford the basis for a conviction in criminal cases. Ala.Dig. Criminal Law 563. In a homicide case we stated the principle in Payne v. State, 48 Ala.App. 401, 265 So.2d 185.
We have considered the entire record under Code 1940, T. 15, § 389, including the following:
a) The clerk’s certificate;
b) The court reporter’s certificate;
c) The statement of the organization of the court ( — but see Supreme Court Rule 52);
d) The indictment (caption, charge, conclusions, and required endorsements) ;
e) Judgment entry (arraignment, presence of counsel, empanelling of jury, verdict, adjudication of guilt, allocutus, sentence and notice of appeal) ; and
f) Each ruling of the trial judge adverse to the appellant, including without limitation the written charges refused appellant.
From this examination we conclude the judgment below should be
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 So. 2d 381, 52 Ala. App. 290, 1974 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-state-alacrimapp-1974.