Grant v. Sheppard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Grant v. Sheppard

23 A.D.2d 618, 256 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4848

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1965

StatusPublished

This text of 23 A.D.2d 618 (Grant v. Sheppard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. Sheppard, 23 A.D.2d 618, 256 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order insofar as they set aside the verdict of the jury affirmed; insofar as they dismiss the complaint judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: We agree with the conclusion of the trial court that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence. We conclude, however, that it was error to dismiss the complaint. Accordingly, a new trial is granted. All concur, except Bastow and Noonan, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the verdict. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida Trial Term, setting aside the verdict of the jury in an automobile negligence action; also appeal from order granting motion to set aside the verdict.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecehio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order insofar as they set aside the verdict of the jury affirmed; insofar as they dismiss the complaint judgment and order reversed on the law and facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. Memorandum: We agree with the conclusion of the trial court that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence. We conclude, however, that it was error to dismiss the complaint. Accordingly, a new trial is granted. All concur, except Bastow and Noonan, JJ., who dissent and vote to reverse and to reinstate the verdict. (Appeal from judgment of Oneida Trial Term, setting aside the verdict of the jury in an automobile negligence action; also appeal from order granting motion to set aside the verdict.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Henry, Noonan and Del Vecehio, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

23 A.D.2d 618, 256 N.Y.S.2d 809, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-sheppard-nyappdiv-1965.