Grant v. Shaw

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Grant v. Shaw

1 Root 526

DecidedFebruary 15, 1793

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 526 (Grant v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Grant v. Shaw, 1 Root 526 (Colo. 1793).

Pincite

Opinion

The officer offered to prove by parol testimony, that he' had • made demand on the execution, and had posted the hay; but no,t allowed, because he is to be justified by his return in anr action brought against him, unless it is falsified; but in an [527]*527action, brought against the purchaser under him the case would be otherwise, for he has no power over the officer’s return, and may prove by other evidence that the estate was legally sold.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The officer offered to prove by parol testimony, that he' had • made demand on the execution, and had posted the hay; but no,t allowed, because he is to be justified by his return in anr action brought against him, unless it is falsified; but in an [527]*527action, brought against the purchaser under him the case would be otherwise, for he has no power over the officer’s return, and may prove by other evidence that the estate was legally sold.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Root 526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grant-v-shaw-conn-1793.